海棠之罪

Group 1 - The core issue discussed is the definition of creative freedom versus legal boundaries in the context of contemporary societal standards [3][10][26] - The article highlights a specific incident involving a popular game, "燕云十六声," where female characters' outfits were criticized for being overly revealing, sparking a debate on whether this constitutes a violation of creative freedom or a legal issue [5][6][12] - The author argues that the dissatisfaction expressed by female players regarding character designs reflects a shift in societal standards rather than a failure of existing laws [14][19][25] Group 2 - The discussion emphasizes that if short skirts are deemed to objectify women, then similar criticisms could be applied to other forms of creative expression, such as "海棠小黄文" [17][24][26] - The article suggests that there is a double standard in how creative freedom is defended for certain types of content while being criticized for others, indicating a need for consistency in the application of legal and moral standards [20][25] - The author calls for a more grounded discussion on whether specific representations, like short skirts in games, are acceptable under current societal norms, implying that if they are not, then other forms of creative expression should also be scrutinized [26][10][19]