Workflow
构建治理基层腐败问题长效机制

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for a systematic approach to combat grassroots corruption, advocating for a comprehensive strategy that includes deterrence, prevention, and motivation against corruption [1] Group 2 - Establishing a grassroots supervision network is crucial, focusing on scientific power distribution, standardized exercise of power, and effective supervision to address corruption in key areas such as rural revitalization, education, healthcare, and social security [2] - The responsibility of grassroots party organizations and functional departments must be clarified to create a collaborative work pattern involving various stakeholders in combating corruption [2] - A mechanism for regular collaboration should be established to enhance the effectiveness of grassroots supervision, utilizing big data and innovative public participation methods [2] Group 3 - Maintaining a high-pressure stance on corruption is essential, with a focus on case handling to demonstrate commitment and effectiveness in combating corruption [3] - Expanding sources of information for investigations by integrating data from various departments and utilizing big data techniques to improve the precision of problem detection [3] - Strengthening the coordination among different supervisory organizations to enhance the quality and efficiency of case handling [3] Group 4 - Emphasizing source governance is vital, with a focus on preventing corruption by addressing root causes and enhancing the awareness of integrity among grassroots officials [4] - Implementing strict execution of regulations and transparency in power operations to minimize discretionary power and improve governance effectiveness [4]