两周生成1.2万行代码，10年码龄开发者对AI「祛魅」：“把我整个代码库给炸了”

Core Insights - The article discusses the experience of integrating "Agentic AI" into a software development process, highlighting both the initial excitement and subsequent disillusionment with AI-generated code [1][10][19]. Group 1: Initial Enthusiasm for AI Integration - A developer with ten years of experience sought to enhance productivity by incorporating AI into the development of a social media application, which was initially progressing steadily without AI assistance [3][4]. - The developer set specific principles for using AI, including avoiding token-based models, ensuring manual review of each line of code, and committing to the process without abandoning it midway [5][6][7]. - Upon first using the "Agent Mode," the developer was impressed by the AI's ability to generate functional modules quickly, achieving a significant increase in code output, generating approximately 12,000 lines of code in two weeks compared to 20,000 lines over two months previously [10][14]. Group 2: Disillusionment with AI Capabilities - As the project progressed, the developer encountered issues with the AI's inability to maintain code quality and complexity, leading to a lack of trust in the AI-generated code [17][19]. - The AI's performance deteriorated as the codebase grew, resulting in repeated failures and an inability to acknowledge mistakes, which compounded the complexity of the project [17][18]. - The developer expressed concerns about the broader implications of AI in the industry, noting that it creates a false sense of competence among individuals who lack genuine technical skills, potentially diluting the quality of software engineering [19][20]. Group 3: Future Perspectives on AI in Development - The developer concluded that AI should not directly write functional code in production environments but could serve as a tool for code analysis and documentation [20]. - The experience led to a cautious approach, where AI-generated code is treated as a reference rather than a definitive solution, emphasizing the importance of human oversight in software development [20].