市场永不失灵：市场的新认识

Group 1 - The research proposes a new paradigm that markets are self-organizing systems that never fail, challenging the traditional view of "market failure" [1][2] - It integrates complex systems theory, evolutionary economics, and institutional analysis to redefine market mechanisms and their operational logic [2][3] - The study identifies that traditional "market failure" phenomena stem from external factors such as institutional deficiencies, power intervention distortions, and weak information infrastructure, rather than inherent flaws in market mechanisms [1][4] Group 2 - The research introduces a dynamic collaborative analysis framework of "market-self-organization-institutional environment-government function" to address the limitations of static equilibrium analysis [2][4] - It emphasizes the need to shift the focus from internal market failures to external factors like institutional flaws and power interventions [2][4] - The study suggests redefining government roles to become "builders of institutional infrastructure" rather than mere correctors of market failures [2][3] Group 3 - The research highlights the self-organizing nature of markets, showcasing their dynamic adaptability, self-repair capabilities, and innovation-driven mechanisms [3][12] - It argues that market efficiency is maintained through dynamic competition, where monopolies are temporary and innovation plays a crucial role in dissolving them [15][30] - The study illustrates that market participants can spontaneously generate governance rules through interactions, demonstrating the market's self-governance ability [18][19] Group 4 - The research identifies that traditional economic theories often overlook the impact of institutional environments and power interventions on market operations [19][20] - It discusses how institutional deficiencies, such as unclear property rights and ineffective contract enforcement, fundamentally undermine market functions [20][21] - The study emphasizes the importance of technology and institutional innovation in addressing market failures and enhancing market resilience [24][25] Group 5 - The research concludes that the concept of "market failure" should be redefined to reflect the disruption of necessary institutional environments, information conditions, or competitive foundations [25][37] - It advocates for a governance model that prioritizes institutional repair, power constraints, and technological inclusivity to foster market self-organization [25][37] - The study suggests that the government's role should focus on creating a clear, fair, and transparent institutional environment to support market mechanisms [25][41]