美学者：也许我们应该更多地学习中国，而不是对其成功视而不见

Group 1 - The core argument presented by Richard D. Wolff is that the resilience of the Chinese economy in the face of trade wars is rooted in its unique institutional advantages, contrasting sharply with the profit-driven nature of American capitalism [1][4][8] - Wolff critiques American capitalism as being fundamentally profit-driven, leading to structural issues that manifest in trade wars and a lack of domestic prosperity [2][3][8] - He highlights that the U.S. has outsourced manufacturing to lower-cost countries, which has not resulted in domestic economic growth, but rather reflects a systemic issue within American capitalism [2][3] Group 2 - Wolff emphasizes that China's economic model is characterized by a strong government role that guides development in key sectors, allowing for rapid advancements in areas like high-speed rail and renewable energy [5][6] - The mixed economy in China, which combines state-owned and private enterprises, is seen as a mechanism to address market failures and ensure that critical sectors are not neglected [6][7] - The institutional goals in China focus on serving national development and public interests, contrasting with the shareholder-centric approach of American corporate governance [7][8] Group 3 - Wolff argues that the efficiency and organizational capacity of China's system are significant factors contributing to its economic success, especially in the context of trade tensions with the U.S. [8][9] - He posits that the U.S. is experiencing a decline, with internal crises exacerbated by a focus on profit over public welfare, leading to deteriorating infrastructure and social division [8][9] - The discussion raises the question of whether the U.S. has the willingness to learn from China's institutional strengths, despite the complexities and challenges present in Chinese society [9][10]