大模型“考生”破题全国一卷高考作文，听听人工智能专家怎么说

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of various AI models in writing high school entrance exam essays, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses in understanding materials and generating coherent, insightful content [1][15]. Group 1: AI Model Performance - The selected AI models for the essay evaluation include DeepSeek, Baidu Wenxin Yiyan, Zhiyu Qingyan, and ChatGPT-4o, all of which are general-purpose models [2][3]. - The models struggled with understanding the deeper connections between the provided materials and the exam prompt, often resulting in superficial interpretations [3][4]. - Notably, DeepSeek and ChatGPT-4o deviated from the historical context of the materials, while Zhiyu Qingyan and Baidu Wenxin Yiyan managed to incorporate relevant themes [2][3]. Group 2: Evaluation Criteria - Key evaluation criteria for the essays included topic relevance, language expression, logical structure, and cognitive alignment with the prompt [4][15]. - The essays were scored by experienced language teachers, with scores ranging from 40 to 50, indicating varying levels of understanding and expression [5][6][14]. Group 3: Expert Insights - Experts noted that while AI models can generate grammatically correct and logically structured essays, they often lack emotional depth and unique personal insights [15][18]. - The consensus among educators is that AI models can enhance writing skills but should not be overly relied upon, as they may lead to cognitive outsourcing and a lack of critical thinking [17][19]. - AI models are seen as tools to promote educational equity and facilitate personalized learning experiences, but their limitations in creativity and emotional expression remain a concern [17][18].