哈佛，能在法律上战胜特朗普吗？

Group 1 - The core conflict between Trump and Harvard is rooted in the ideological tension between Trump's MAGA movement and the generally left-leaning culture of American universities, which is expected to manifest in various forms in the future [2] - The Trump administration has exerted pressure on Harvard through multiple means, including freezing federal funding and threatening to revoke tax-exempt status, leading to legal challenges from Harvard [1][2] - The legal battles are likely to focus on constitutional issues regarding the separation of powers, particularly the boundaries of legislative, executive, and judicial authority [2][3] Group 2 - The Trump administration's suspension of visa approvals for international students at Harvard raises questions about the authority of administrative agencies to restrict entry for specific groups, which ties into constitutional protections [3][4] - The basis for Trump's actions is the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which grants the president broad discretion to suspend entry for foreign nationals deemed harmful to U.S. interests [4][5] - Historical judicial precedents have affirmed the executive branch's plenary power over immigration matters, making it challenging for Harvard to contest these actions [6][9] Group 3 - Harvard's legal strategy may involve arguing that the policies targeting foreign students infringe upon its First Amendment rights and significantly hinder its educational and research missions [11][12] - The university could also claim that the actions against it are politically motivated, as Trump has publicly targeted Harvard, which may strengthen its case [12][13] - Despite the challenges, Harvard's position as a prominent U.S. institution may provide a unique legal standing compared to previous cases involving non-citizens [10]