Group 1 - The article discusses the legislative developments regarding stablecoins in the US, contrasting it with the digitalization of the Chinese yuan, and suggests that stablecoins are not intended to undermine the US dollar but rather serve as a currency intermediary [2][4] - Stablecoins, such as USDT and USDC, are private cryptocurrencies pegged to the US dollar at a 1:1 ratio, supported by reserves like cash and government bonds, and they hold a 90% market share in the global stablecoin market, with 30% of cross-border payment transactions [4][5] - The significance of using stablecoins lies in their ability to streamline transactions and reduce fees compared to traditional banking systems, positioning them as a challenge to conventional payment methods rather than a threat to the Federal Reserve [5][7] Group 2 - Stablecoins are seen as a smart design emerging from market economics, bridging digital currencies and the US dollar while facilitating decentralized peer-to-peer transactions and addressing credit issues in a decentralized market [7][9] - The comparison between digital yuan and stablecoins raises questions about stability and credit, with the digital yuan backed by state credit but lacking the decentralized characteristics of stablecoins, which may limit its potential as a global currency [7][9] - The article highlights that if the yuan cannot be freely convertible, it cannot become a true global currency, thus constraining the potential of digital yuan, while stablecoins, backed by the US dollar, may offer more reliability in times of economic crisis [9]
同是数字货币:数字人民币与稳定币,谁更稳定?