Workflow
业务聚焦丨增强以案促改促治实效

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of addressing the "second half" of case handling in anti-corruption efforts, focusing on problem analysis and effective rectification suggestions to prevent corruption from taking root [1][2] - The Dehua County Discipline Inspection Commission and Supervisory Committee adopts a "full-cycle management" approach, integrating case handling with subsequent measures to enhance governance effectiveness [1] - The focus is on strengthening case investigations, particularly in key areas such as state-owned enterprises, healthcare, education, and engineering bidding, to combat "micro-corruption" [1][2] Group 2 - The article highlights the need for in-depth case analysis, advocating for a systematic view to understand both individual cases and broader systemic issues that contribute to corruption [2] - The Dehua County Discipline Inspection Commission emphasizes the importance of analyzing the political ecology, internal control mechanisms, and management processes of the units involved in corruption cases [2] - The article discusses the implementation of targeted rectification measures based on the issues identified in cases, ensuring a closed-loop process for case handling and systemic improvement [3] Group 3 - The article outlines a dual approach to governance: addressing issues revealed by cases while also proactively preventing future occurrences through education and awareness initiatives [3] - The Dehua County Discipline Inspection Commission aims to create a robust mechanism for moral and legal education, utilizing various methods such as warning education conferences and court observation [3] - The focus is on building a strong ideological barrier against corruption by leveraging case resources and promoting accountability [3]