纳思达“高买低卖”的资产虚不虚？控股股东“低吸高抛”有无资本套利局

Core Viewpoint - Nasda's frequent external mergers and acquisitions appear to lack growth quality despite significant scale, with nearly 200 billion in revenue over ten years but a loss of 1 billion. The aftereffects of acquisitions are becoming evident, as the company plans to sell Lexmark International, acquired for over 10 billion, for less than 150 million, raising questions about the underlying motives and the quality of the acquired assets [1][4][13]. Group 1: Financial Performance - The company has reported cumulative revenue of nearly 200 billion over ten years but has incurred a total loss of 1 billion [7][9]. - Lexmark International, acquired for 27 billion USD, has contributed significant revenue but limited profit, with an average annual revenue contribution of around 15 billion from 2017 to 2024, yet the operating profit margin has been below 3% [9][12]. - The company’s revenue has significantly declined since 2019, with a notable drop in performance leading to substantial goodwill impairment in 2023 [15][19]. Group 2: Acquisition Strategy - From 2015 to 2021, Nasda engaged in acquisitions totaling over 25 billion, including the significant purchase of Lexmark International [5][6]. - The company plans to sell Lexmark International for a price significantly lower than its acquisition cost, raising concerns about the rationale behind such a decision [13][23]. - The acquisition of BenTu Electronics was marked by high premiums, with the transaction valued at 6.6 billion, involving related parties, which raises questions about potential capital arbitrage [24][25]. Group 3: Goodwill and Asset Quality - As of 2024, the company reported a goodwill balance of 135 billion, primarily from the Lexmark acquisition, which has not been adequately impaired despite declining revenues [15][20]. - The company has faced scrutiny regarding the reasonableness of its goodwill impairment assessments, particularly in light of significant revenue declines and unfulfilled performance commitments from acquired entities [16][19]. - Lexmark's own financials indicate a concerning trend, with its goodwill consistently exceeding its net assets, suggesting potential issues with asset quality [20][21]. Group 4: Market Reaction and Stock Performance - Despite the company's efforts to enhance investor confidence through share buybacks, the stock price has faced downward pressure, dropping over 60% from its peak [2][23]. - The company's financial metrics indicate that while revenue has surged, profitability remains weak, leading to skepticism in the market regarding its long-term viability [7][12]. Group 5: External Environment Impact - The company has cited adverse external conditions affecting its operations, particularly the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Lexmark's business, which has led to significant declines in sales and operational challenges [17][19]. - The overall financial health of the company has deteriorated, with rising debt levels and increasing financial pressure, prompting the decision to divest Lexmark [22][23].