山东枣庄峄城区:‌构建“纪巡审”联动监督体系

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the integration of disciplinary inspection, inspection, and audit supervision mechanisms to address issues such as decentralized supervision, information barriers, and ineffective rectification in grassroots governance [1][2] - The district has established a pre-judgment mechanism by sharing data among the three supervisory bodies, resulting in the identification of 242 suspicious data points from over 2300 shared data entries [1] - The focus on rural collective "three assets" management has led to proactive audits that uncover issues such as misappropriation of funds by village officials, with continuous follow-up investigations by the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities [1] Group 2 - The district has made the evaluation of inspection rectification effectiveness a key aspect of the "disciplinary inspection, inspection, and audit" linkage, with specific guidelines and responsibilities outlined [2] - Feedback from inspection results is shared with the disciplinary inspection and audit departments to ensure coordinated efforts in addressing identified issues through various supervisory methods [2]