督察整改要因类施策，确保效果扎实

Core Viewpoint - The newly issued "Regulations on Ecological Environment Protection Supervision" emphasizes the importance of rectification work to address identified issues, ensuring a closed-loop process in environmental governance [1][2]. Group 1: Rectification Process - The regulations require entities under supervision to develop rectification plans that specify responsible parties, goals, timelines, key measures, and verification units for each identified issue [1]. - Rectification is categorized into three types based on complexity: immediate rectification for simple issues, structured long-term plans for complex issues, and comprehensive strategies for historical problems [2][3]. Group 2: Types of Issues - Simple issues are expected to be resolved quickly, with local governments mobilizing resources to achieve satisfactory outcomes for the public [2]. - Complex issues often involve significant investment and technical challenges, necessitating a resilient approach and continuous optimization of solutions to minimize pollution at the lowest cost [3]. - Historical issues present significant challenges due to their complex backgrounds, requiring careful management and a gradual approach to achieve compliance with environmental standards [4]. Group 3: Case Studies - A case involving a town with multiple stone processing enterprises highlighted the need for a balanced approach, combining shutdowns and upgrades to address noise and air pollution effectively [3]. - In another instance, a long-standing antimony pollution issue in a mountainous area required a phased strategy to manage both point and non-point source pollution while considering the operational viability of local mining enterprises [4].