石油终于涨了，波斯成了代价

Group 1 - The article discusses the implications of U.S. military actions and political maneuvers, suggesting that the military is cautious about engaging in conflicts that could lead to significant losses [1][3][4] - It highlights the historical context of U.S. military interventions, particularly under the Bush administration, which were driven by oil interests and resulted in increased national debt [4][20][38] - The article emphasizes the strategic importance of oil prices in U.S. economic policy, linking military actions in the Middle East to efforts to raise oil prices and manage national debt [16][21][38] Group 2 - The piece outlines the geopolitical dynamics involving the U.S., Russia, and Middle Eastern countries, particularly focusing on oil control and the impact on European economies [2][21][35] - It suggests that the U.S. is leveraging conflicts, such as those involving Iran, to manipulate oil prices for economic benefits, drawing parallels to past strategies [36][41] - The article concludes that the current U.S. administration may be repeating historical patterns of using military action to influence economic conditions, particularly in relation to oil and debt management [38][40][41]