特朗普称中美已达成协议，美国将对华征收55%关税，商务部回应来了

Group 1 - The article discusses the ongoing trade tensions between the U.S. and China, highlighting Trump's announcement of a 55% tariff on Chinese goods as a politically motivated move ahead of the midterm elections [1][10] - The breakdown of the 55% tariff includes a 10% base tariff, a 20% penalty tax on fentanyl, and a 25% trade war tariff, which the article describes as a complex and misleading calculation [2][4] - China's response to Trump's tariff declaration is characterized as strategic and measured, emphasizing the importance of adhering to WTO rules and opposing unilateral tariffs [5][10] Group 2 - The article highlights the significance of rare earth exports in the trade negotiations, noting that while the U.S. has received a temporary export license from China, it is limited and excludes military applications [7][10] - The U.S. finds itself in a difficult position, needing rare earth materials for its industries while also facing the challenge of acknowledging its reliance on China in the trade war [7][9] - The article suggests that China's approach to rare earth exports is a strategic maneuver, allowing limited access while maintaining leverage in the negotiations [10][12] Group 3 - The article concludes that the trade negotiations represent a new normal in U.S.-China relations, with the U.S. increasingly relying on public relations to mask its negotiating weaknesses, while China employs a more subtle and strategic approach [12][13] - The upcoming six-month period regarding the rare earth export license is framed as a critical test of Washington's political credibility and Beijing's strategic resolve [12][13]