巨额补贴的公共自行车，该退场了

Core Viewpoint - The public bicycle system in various regions is facing termination due to the rise of shared bicycles, which offer more convenience and lower operational costs [3][11][21]. Group 1: Termination of Public Bicycle Services - Recent announcements indicate that public bicycle services in places like Chuzhou and Ma'anshan have ceased operations as of late May [1][2]. - Dongying City in Shandong plans to stop its public bicycle service starting June 30, following similar actions in Yantai [2]. - The trend of public bicycle service termination is not new and is expected to continue as shared bicycles dominate the market [3][21]. Group 2: Historical Context and Evolution - Public bicycles were first introduced in Hangzhou in 2008, initially addressing the "last mile" transportation issue before the advent of shared bicycles [3][6]. - The initial excitement around public bicycles has diminished over the years, with many regions now questioning their necessity [4][21]. - By 2015, over 500 regions had implemented public bicycle systems, but currently, only about 300 remain operational [15][16]. Group 3: Comparison with Shared Bicycles - Shared bicycles have proven to be more efficient and cost-effective compared to public bicycles, which are often seen as outdated [11][14][20]. - The operational costs of public bicycles are significantly higher, with maintenance costs reported to be around 7,000 to 8,000 yuan per bicycle, compared to 700 to 1,500 yuan for shared bicycles [18][19]. - Public bicycles primarily rely on government subsidies, while shared bicycles operate on a market-driven model, making the latter more sustainable [18][20]. Group 4: Financial Implications - Public bicycle systems are often unable to achieve financial self-sufficiency, leading to increased pressure on local governments to subsidize operations [18][19]. - The operational model of public bicycles, which includes high maintenance costs and low revenue generation, raises questions about their viability in the current economic climate [19][20]. - Some regions have cited reasons such as low usage rates and aging vehicles for ceasing operations, masking the underlying financial challenges [19][21]. Group 5: Government Involvement and Market Dynamics - The initial government involvement in establishing public bicycle systems was justified as a response to public transportation needs, but the market has since evolved [12][22]. - The complexity of withdrawing government support from public bicycle systems poses challenges, as it involves political and administrative considerations [22][23]. - The persistence of public bicycle systems in some areas raises questions about the effectiveness of market-driven solutions versus government intervention [23][24].