安理会内部再交锋，中方翻出旧账，瑞典紧急叫停，能源供应遭破坏

Group 1 - The "Nord Stream" pipeline explosion remains an unresolved mystery, with no clear conclusions despite investigations by multiple countries [1][3] - The recent UN Security Council meeting highlighted differing attitudes among countries regarding the investigation, revealing underlying tensions and potential concealment [1][3] - China has taken a proactive stance in the UN, posing critical questions aimed at promoting international stability and addressing the delays in the investigation [1][6] Group 2 - Investigations by Denmark, Sweden, and Germany have faced scrutiny, particularly regarding the exclusion of Russia and the lack of transparency in the findings [5][7] - Germany has reported preliminary findings of explosive traces but has not reached definitive conclusions, while speculation about the involvement of the US and Ukraine has emerged [9][11] - The meeting underscored the contrasting positions of Western countries, with the US denying responsibility and attempting to block Russia's participation in the investigation [11][13] Group 3 - China's firm stance emphasizes the importance of energy security and the need for transparent and legitimate methods to resolve disputes in the current tense international climate [13] - China has called for Germany to expedite the release of investigation results and for relevant countries to engage with Russia to avoid political interference [13] - The insistence on transparency and cooperation from China signals a clear message to the international community about the necessity of uncovering the truth to maintain global peace and stability [13]