花30万“买”名校入学资格？法院：合同无效，全额退款

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal invalidity of contracts that violate public order and morals, specifically in the context of circumventing the national college entrance examination system in China [2][4]. Group 1: Case Background - A mother, Liu Xin, paid 300,000 yuan to a middleman, Song Qiang, to secure her child’s admission to a prestigious university without taking the college entrance exam [1]. - The child, Xiao Chen, was promised an educational experience similar to regular students but found the actual learning environment to be significantly different and unsatisfactory, leading to withdrawal from the program [1]. Group 2: Court Ruling - The Beijing Third Intermediate People's Court ruled that the contract between Liu Xin and Song Qiang was invalid due to its violation of public order and morals, as it undermined the fairness and authority of the national college entrance examination system [2][4]. - The court mandated that Song Qiang must return the full amount of 300,000 yuan to Liu Xin, as the contract was deemed null and void from the outset [2][4]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The ruling emphasized that any attempt to bypass the national examination system through financial means or connections is a challenge to public order, resulting in the invalidity of such contracts [4]. - The court advised the public to carefully review contract contents to avoid entering into agreements that violate legal provisions or public morals, which could lead to financial losses [4].