Workflow
蛋鸡产业非笼养转型的商业价值
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-06-18 01:55

Core Viewpoint - The global egg-laying hen industry is transitioning from traditional caged systems to cage-free models, driven by consumer concerns for animal welfare and food safety, government regulations, and corporate sustainability strategies. Group 1: Commercial Factors - Over 2,500 cage-free commitments have been made globally, with a transition rate of 75% in 2023, particularly notable in Europe (80%) and the U.S. (73%) [1][19][27] - The EU and several countries have banned or plan to phase out caged systems, while 10 states in the U.S. have prohibited battery cages, necessitating proactive planning by companies in regions without such legislation [1][30] - Transitioning to cage-free systems requires capital investment, with lower stocking densities impacting profitability and increasing feed and labor costs. Strategies to mitigate these costs include phased transitions, raising prices, securing contracts, and employee training [1][40][41] Group 2: Animal Welfare - Cage-free systems significantly improve the living conditions of hens, with no significant difference in mortality rates compared to enriched cages, and health issues can be managed through better design and management [3][61] - Cage-free systems allow hens to express natural behaviors such as flapping, dust bathing, and perching, which are severely restricted in caged environments [3][65] - Psychological well-being is enhanced in cage-free systems, with reduced fear and stress levels, leading to increased positive behaviors like exploration and dust bathing [4] Group 3: Human Factors - Consumers are increasingly concerned about hen welfare and are willing to pay a premium for cage-free eggs, believing them to be more nutritious, safe, and natural [5][6] - The nutritional quality of cage-free eggs can be superior under good management, and food safety risks are more related to management practices than the type of system used [6][7] - Farmers face challenges in transitioning due to costs and labor, but consumer demand and market access opportunities drive the shift, with professional training improving success rates [7] Group 4: Environmental Impact - Cage-free systems increase feed, electricity, and land use, with feed being the primary environmental impact source, particularly due to land use changes from soybean and palm oil production [8][9] - Strategies to mitigate environmental impacts include using alternative feeds, optimizing formulations, selecting specific breeds, and adjusting consumption patterns, as demonstrated by companies like Barilla and Kipster [9]