特朗普的关税大战，已打成美国想要的样子，中国或成最大受害者？

Group 1: Core Argument - The article discusses the recent developments in Trump's tariff war, highlighting his decision to suspend tariffs for 90 days on countries that do not retaliate, while maintaining a 10% base tariff, affecting approximately 75 countries [1] - It suggests that the tariff war has primarily targeted China, which is seen as the biggest victim, while other countries have managed to avoid the brunt of the tariffs [1] Group 2: Underlying Logic of the Tariff War - The article argues that the root cause of the tariff war is not about making America great again, but rather a response to the economic difficulties faced by the U.S. [3] - It references the historical context of U.S.-China relations, indicating that the U.S. has viewed China as a primary competitor since the 2008 financial crisis [5][7] Group 3: Global Reactions and Implications - The article posits that many countries are pleased with the U.S.-China conflict, as it allows them to benefit economically while China suffers [7][10] - It emphasizes that the ongoing geopolitical tensions, including the Russia-Ukraine conflict, complicate the U.S.'s position and weaken its alliances, particularly with Europe [12][13] Group 4: Conclusion on the Tariff War's Effectiveness - The article concludes that Trump's tariff war has ultimately failed, as evidenced by the lack of significant gains for the U.S. and the successful counteractions by China [17][19] - It suggests that the U.S. is caught in a "deadlock" with multiple adversaries, indicating a challenging future for American foreign policy [15]