Workflow
买房路上的“跳单”风波!
Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-06-19 10:47

Core Points - The case revolves around a dispute between a client, Awen, and a real estate agency, Company A, regarding a property transaction and alleged breach of contract [1][2] - Awen is accused of "jumping the order" by bypassing the agency after utilizing their services to find a property [2][3] - The court ruled that Awen did indeed breach the contract by directly purchasing the property without compensating the agency, leading to a penalty of 60,000 yuan [3][4] Summary by Sections Contractual Agreement - Awen signed a "Viewing Confirmation" which stipulated a 2% commission fee if he purchased a property through Company A, and a 3% penalty if he bypassed the agency [1][2] - The court recognized the existence of a contractual relationship based on the signed document [3] Court Proceedings - Awen argued that the agency's services were not essential to the transaction, claiming his ex-wife had prior knowledge of the property and negotiated the purchase directly [2][4] - The court found that Awen had indeed utilized the agency's services and subsequently bypassed them, fulfilling the criteria for "jumping the order" as defined by law [3][4] Legal Definitions and Implications - "Jumping the order" is defined as a client using an agency's services to find a property but then directly negotiating with the seller to avoid paying the agency's commission [7][8] - The legal consequences of "jumping the order" include the obligation to pay the agreed commission and any stipulated penalties [8][9] Recommendations for Clients - Clients are advised to choose reputable agencies and carefully review contract terms to avoid potential disputes related to "jumping the order" [12][13] - Maintaining proper documentation of transactions and communications can help in proving the legitimacy of the transaction and the use of agency services [13][14]