中科环保: 企业负责人经营业绩考核管理办法

Core Viewpoint - The document outlines the performance evaluation and compensation management system for the executives of Beijing Zhongke Runyu Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd, emphasizing the importance of aligning performance assessments with both short-term and long-term corporate goals while ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Performance Evaluation Principles - The performance evaluation of executives will prioritize quality and efficiency, focusing on enhancing economic benefits and capital returns [5]. - The evaluation will adhere to market-oriented principles, ensuring that market mechanisms play a decisive role in resource allocation [2]. - The evaluation process will combine short-term objectives with long-term development strategies, fostering a comprehensive assessment system [2][3]. Group 2: Evaluation Indicators - The evaluation indicators will include both quantitative metrics, such as total revenue and net profit, and qualitative metrics based on strategic goals and operational needs [3][4]. - Specific quantitative indicators include net profit and economic value added, while qualitative indicators will be selected based on the company's strategic objectives [4][5]. Group 3: Annual and Term Evaluation - The annual performance evaluation will be scored based on a combination of quantitative and qualitative indicators, categorized into four grades: A, B, C, and D [4][5]. - The term evaluation will focus on the annualized growth rate of state-owned capital and main business revenue, with specific targets set for different revenue levels [6][7]. Group 4: Accountability Mechanism - A robust accountability mechanism will be established to ensure compliance with laws and regulations, with penalties for executives who fail to meet performance standards or engage in misconduct [10][11]. - The document specifies that any significant violations or failures leading to substantial losses will result in severe penalties, including potential dismissal and legal action [10][11]. Group 5: Implementation and Governance - The performance evaluation system will be subject to approval by the board of directors and will be regularly reviewed to adapt to changes in the business environment [11][12]. - The document emphasizes the importance of aligning the evaluation results with the appointment and dismissal of executives, ensuring that performance assessments are a key factor in governance decisions [11][12].