Core Viewpoint - The U.S. military has conducted airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, claiming to have "completely eliminated" them, while Iran asserts that the strikes did not significantly damage its nuclear capabilities and that materials were relocated prior to the attacks [1][4][10]. Group 1: U.S. Actions - The U.S. announced airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, specifically targeting Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz [4][10]. - Reports indicate that the Fordow facility is located 80 to 100 meters underground and is designed to withstand airstrikes, with the U.S. attack reportedly only damaging entrance tunnels [4][12]. - Prior to the strikes, the U.S. allegedly informed Iran of its intentions and clarified that it did not seek a full-scale war [1][7]. Group 2: Iranian Response - Iranian officials claim that the Fordow facility was not severely damaged and that all hazardous materials had been evacuated before the attack [1][4][7]. - Iran's parliament representative stated that there were no reports of radiation leaks or casualties following the airstrikes [1]. - Iran's leadership has condemned the U.S. actions as a violation of international law and has vowed to take necessary measures to defend its rights [10][12]. Group 3: Regional Implications - Analysts suggest that the U.S. strikes could escalate tensions in the Middle East and potentially lead to a prolonged conflict involving Iran [12][13]. - There are concerns that Iran may reassess its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in response to the attacks [13]. - Potential Iranian retaliatory actions could include withdrawing from the Non-Proliferation Treaty or targeting Israeli facilities [13][14].
核设施提前疏散了?伊朗记者称福尔道地区仿佛没有发生过袭击
Guan Cha Zhe Wang·2025-06-22 11:41