网约车乘客“逃单”，司机该找谁要钱？

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal complexities surrounding ride-hailing services, particularly regarding the responsibilities of platform companies in cases of passenger fare evasion [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Relationships - The court identified three main legal relationships: between the platform company and the driver, the platform company and the passenger, and the driver and the passenger, establishing a new type of intermediary contract based on internet information services [3][4]. - The platform company is responsible for providing information to facilitate the contract between the driver and the passenger, but it does not have an obligation to cover fare losses incurred due to passenger evasion [4][6]. Group 2: Information Disclosure - The court ruled that the platform company must disclose reasonable personal information of passengers to the driver when fare evasion occurs, to allow the driver to seek remedies based on the passenger transport contract [3][4]. - The platform company argued that it only collects necessary information and is not required to provide additional personal details, which the court found valid until the driver faced issues with fare collection [3][4]. Group 3: Implications for the Industry - The case serves as a precedent for how ride-hailing platforms should handle fare evasion and the disclosure of passenger information, impacting future legal interpretations and industry practices [6][7]. - Recommendations for the industry include standardizing payment methods, improving payment reminders, and implementing consequences for fare evasion, such as sharing data across platforms to prevent repeat offenders [7].