OpenAI首款硬件被指“像素级抄袭”，官方光速删帖

Core Viewpoint - OpenAI's $6.5 billion acquisition of the "IO" project has led to a lawsuit from a startup named IYO, claiming trademark infringement and unfair competition due to similarities in product design and branding [2][22][44]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - IYO, founded in 2018 from Alphabet's Google X, has invested $60 million to develop next-generation hardware that allows users to interact with devices without traditional interfaces [7][8]. - The lawsuit claims that OpenAI was aware of IYO's brand and products since at least 2022 and had multiple meetings with IYO's team, including discussions about potential collaboration [14][16]. - IYO's product, IYO ONE, is an audio-based device that uses voice commands for interaction, which closely resembles the functionality of OpenAI's IO project [10][22]. Group 2: Product Comparisons - IYO ONE features a unique design with 16 beamforming microphones and bone conduction technology, enabling immersive audio experiences and private voice interactions [25]. - The software applications of IYO ONE include real-time voice translation, smart noise cancellation, and an AI-driven music assistant, all coordinated by a natural language agent named SHELL [28][29]. - OpenAI's IO project, announced with high expectations, aims to redefine human-computer interaction without screens, echoing IYO's long-established concepts [32][35]. Group 3: Trademark and Branding Issues - IYO applied for the "IYO" trademark in September 2021, which was approved in June 2024, covering audio headphones and related electronic devices [36]. - The IO project was registered as a Delaware company in September 2023, with operations starting in April 2024, raising questions about the timeline of trademark awareness [37]. - IYO alleges that OpenAI's use of the "IO" name is likely to cause confusion in the market, impacting IYO's brand reputation and funding efforts [22][39]. Group 4: Legal Proceedings and Responses - Following the lawsuit, a temporary restraining order was issued, requiring OpenAI to remove promotional materials for the IO project [44]. - OpenAI's legal team has responded by denying IYO's claims and asserting that the use of the "IO" name was not malicious [46]. - The ongoing legal battle raises concerns about the future of both companies, with potential implications for product launches and market positioning [51].