特朗普一句“停火”，留下太多谜团！

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around Trump's military action against Iran's nuclear facilities, which is seen as a gamble to pressure Iran into negotiations while maintaining a commitment to avoid prolonged warfare [1][5] - The announcement of a ceasefire between Israel and Iran came shortly after the airstrikes, raising questions about the effectiveness and sustainability of the ceasefire amidst ongoing hostilities [1][3] - Iran's Foreign Minister stated that a ceasefire would only occur if Israel ceased its attacks, indicating a lack of mutual agreement on the terms of the ceasefire [2][3] Group 2 - Iran's restrained response to the airstrikes included a missile attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar, which did not result in casualties, suggesting a desire to avoid further escalation [3] - Trump's call for talks between Israel and Iran indicates a strategic shift, with the U.S. administration seeking to mediate the conflict while acknowledging Iran's weakened state due to recent military actions [3][5] - Experts express skepticism about the durability of the ceasefire, highlighting the need for negotiations to address unresolved issues regarding Iran's nuclear program and missile capabilities [5]