ST新动力董事会超期“服役”被督促 第一大表决权股东所提改选议案未上股东大会就被退回

Core Viewpoint - ST New Power is facing regulatory scrutiny due to the prolonged tenure of its current board, leading to a temporary proposal for board re-election that was ultimately rejected by the company [1][2]. Group 1: Shareholder Proposal - The largest voting shareholder, Tianjin Tengyu, holds approximately 5.86% of the company's total shares and submitted a temporary proposal for board re-election [2][3]. - The company rejected the proposal citing three main reasons: non-compliance with submission timing, the proposal's subject not meeting requirements, and inadequate documentation for the nominated candidates [2][3]. Group 2: Documentation Issues - New Power stated that it did not receive necessary authorization documents from the shareholders to validate Tianjin Tengyu's proposal, which hindered the assessment of the proposal's legitimacy [3]. - The independent director candidates proposed by Tianjin Tengyu failed to submit required documentation, including resumes and integrity records, which are essential for the evaluation process [3]. Group 3: Board Composition and Requirements - The current board of New Power is set to expire in August 2024, and the company has been under pressure from the Hebei Securities Regulatory Bureau to complete the board re-election process [4]. - New Power has outlined specific qualifications for new board members, emphasizing the need for deep professional knowledge and extensive industry experience to support strategic decision-making [5]. Group 4: Candidate Overlap - Among the candidates proposed by Tianjin Tengyu, only one overlaps with New Power's nominations, indicating a significant divergence in the proposed board composition [6].