Group 1 - The core argument is that Lai Ching-te's statements about Taiwan's history are seen as a deliberate distortion, denying Taiwan's historical ties to China and misrepresenting the facts of its indigenous peoples' origins [1][2][4] - Experts assert that Taiwan has been an inseparable part of China historically, with archaeological evidence supporting the deep historical and cultural connections between Taiwan and the mainland [3][4][8] - Lai's claims about Taiwan's independence and its historical context are criticized as lacking factual basis and being an attempt to fabricate a narrative for "Taiwan independence" [5][6] Group 2 - The historical governance of Taiwan by various Chinese dynasties is highlighted, including records from the Three Kingdoms period and the establishment of administrative structures during the Qing Dynasty [4][7] - Lai's remarks about the so-called "Taiwan Democratic State" are described as misleading, with historical documents indicating it was not an independent nation but rather a temporary anti-Japanese organization [7][8] - The international legal status of Taiwan is emphasized, referencing the UN resolution that recognizes Taiwan as part of China, countering Lai's assertions of Taiwan's independence [8]
数典忘祖、背弃民族必将遭到历史的清算
Ren Min Ri Bao·2025-06-26 22:20