关税截止日逼近，日法明确“不接受”，德国“妄想”妥协，一个原因让各国都不敢签

Group 1 - The upcoming results of the "232 clause" investigation by the U.S. Department of Commerce may lead to additional tariffs on imports of semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, and critical minerals if deemed a threat to U.S. security [1] - The "232 tariffs" are expected to replace the current "reciprocal tariffs" as the July 9 deadline approaches, creating uncertainty in trade negotiations [1][4] - The U.S. aims to revitalize domestic manufacturing through the "232 tariffs," which are not aligned with general tariff goals, causing concerns among trading partners about potential new industry-specific tariffs [4][5] Group 2 - Japan is seeking a comprehensive solution to all potential U.S. tariff issues, emphasizing the importance of the automotive sector to its national interests [6] - India is unwilling to sign a trade agreement with the U.S. that does not simultaneously address industry tariffs and "reciprocal tariffs" [7] - France's President Macron insists on a "zero tariffs for zero tariffs" agreement, warning that Europe will respond with equivalent measures if the U.S. maintains a 10% tariff [8] Group 3 - The automotive industry is a significant point of contention in negotiations, with Germany's Chancellor Merz advocating for special treatment for the automotive sector, which is viewed as a challenging factor in reaching any agreement [8] - The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) reports that manufacturers are losing "millions of euros" daily due to tariffs, with over 750,000 cars valued at €38.9 billion exported to the U.S. in 2024 [8]