ST新潮：临时股东大会请求不符合法律规定 董事会否决

Core Viewpoint - ST New潮's board of directors rejected a request from six shareholders to convene a temporary shareholders' meeting, citing procedural violations and the invalidity of the proposals [2][3][4]. Group 1: Board's Rejection Reasons - The board's primary reason for rejection was that the proposal's subject did not meet regulatory requirements, as the request was made by six shareholders, but only four submitted specific proposals [3][4]. - The board highlighted a "timing mismatch" issue, stating that the right to propose temporary resolutions can only be exercised after a meeting notice has been issued, which had not occurred in this case [3][4]. - The board explained the distinction between the "right to convene" (requiring over 10% shareholding) and the "right to propose" (requiring over 3% shareholding), asserting that the requestors attempted to bypass the obligation to submit proposals in their own name [4].