关于投后管理的小建议

Group 1 - The current market environment has led to passive exits and poor post-investment management practices [1][2][4] - There is a growing need for strong post-investment management in the future [3][19] - Many investment institutions lack the capability to manage mergers and acquisitions effectively [5][11][12] Group 2 - The distinction between mergers and equity investments is often misunderstood, with the former requiring operational takeover capabilities [6][7][9] - Many investment firms act merely as funding sources in mergers rather than as capable operators [12][13] - The market currently has undervalued assets, but the perception of ease in acquiring them is misleading [13][14] Group 3 - Effective post-investment management requires a comprehensive monitoring system rather than just relying on consolidated financial statements [23][24] - Single entity financial reports are essential for accurate oversight, as consolidated reports can be misleading [25][26][28] - Audit reports may not be crucial at early stages, but financial statements must be properly documented and stamped [30][34] Group 4 - A complete set of financial documentation should be collected regularly to ensure transparency and accountability [38][41] - Maintaining contact with key personnel in invested companies can facilitate better management and oversight [49][50] - The first step in post-investment management is to gather sufficient data to understand the company's true situation [57][58] Group 5 - The process of collecting and analyzing data should be standardized and tailored to the specific needs of the investment firm [62][64] - Investment firms should prioritize hiring individuals with management experience for post-investment roles rather than solely focusing on academic credentials [64][65]