美媒曝伊朗官员私密通话，白宫急眼

Core Viewpoint - The effectiveness of the recent U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities is being questioned, with claims of significant damage being challenged by intercepted communications from Iranian officials [1][2]. Group 1: Military Action and Impact - The U.S. military used powerful munitions, including a 30,000-pound (approximately 14-ton) bunker buster bomb and Tomahawk cruise missiles, to strike three Iranian nuclear sites [2]. - Reports indicate that while the explosions sealed entrances to two nuclear facilities, they did not destroy the underground structures, and Iran had relocated enriched uranium prior to the attack [5]. - U.S. intelligence officials claim that key components of Iran's nuclear program, including metal conversion facilities, were "completely destroyed," with reconstruction expected to take years [5][7]. Group 2: Government Responses and Disputes - The Trump administration has strongly refuted Iranian officials' assessments of the strikes, labeling them as erroneous and asserting that the military action achieved its intended effects [5][6]. - White House Press Secretary and Pentagon officials criticized media reports as politically motivated and misleading, emphasizing the military's success [1][6]. - There is a divide among U.S. lawmakers regarding the effectiveness of the strikes, with some believing that the core components of Iran's nuclear program remain intact and capable of being quickly restored [7][8].