打关税战，一味的躲是没用的，中国用实际行动，给日本打了个样

Group 1 - The core issue of the global trade war is the impending end of the 90-day suspension period for "reciprocal tariffs" announced by the Trump administration, which is set to expire on July 9 [3] - China's Ministry of Commerce has issued a strong warning against any party sacrificing Chinese interests for trade negotiations, indicating a firm stance in the ongoing discussions [3][5] - The focus of the current global trade situation is shifting towards geopolitical dynamics rather than just tariff negotiations, as the U.S. seeks to form an "anti-China alliance" with other countries [5] Group 2 - The European Union is experiencing internal divisions, with Germany proposing to accept a 10% "minimum baseline tariff" from the U.S., which raises questions about its role as the EU's economic engine [6][8] - French President Macron has taken a hardline stance, insisting on either zero tariffs or a trade war, reflecting the significant stakes for French agricultural exports [8] - The UK has already moved forward with a temporary agreement with the U.S., raising concerns about the implications and hidden clauses within this deal [8] Group 3 - Japan has surprisingly taken a strong position against the U.S. regarding tariffs, with its government demanding either zero tariffs or no negotiations, despite its significant automotive exports to the U.S. [9][11] - Japan is reportedly adjusting its strategy by leveraging its rare earth resources to negotiate for exemptions on automotive tariffs, indicating a complex trade maneuvering [11] - India is rapidly advancing negotiations with the U.S., potentially at the risk of becoming a tool for U.S. interests in Asia, which could have significant implications for the global trade landscape [13][14]