Judge dismisses lawsuit claiming Meta used Trump's ‘Art of the Deal' to train Llama AI

Core Viewpoint - Meta has won a federal lawsuit regarding the alleged unauthorized use of copyrighted books, including "The Art of the Deal," to train its AI model, Llama [1][4][9]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated by authors Richard Kadrey, Christopher Golden, and comedian Sarah Silverman, claiming that Meta used over 190,000 copyrighted books without permission [1][6]. - The plaintiffs argued that Meta is liable for significant copyright infringement by utilizing pirated works to train its AI system [6][14]. - US District Judge Vince Chhabria dismissed the case, stating that the plaintiffs failed to present the correct arguments, but clarified that this ruling does not imply that Meta's practices are lawful [9][11]. Group 2: Meta's Defense - Meta contended that US copyright law permits the unauthorized copying of works for transformative purposes, asserting that the AI-generated outputs are fundamentally different from the original texts [7][9]. - The company expressed appreciation for the court's decision, emphasizing the importance of fair use in developing transformative AI technologies [15][16]. Group 3: Implications and Reactions - The ruling has raised questions about the legality of using copyrighted materials for commercial AI applications, as acknowledged by Meta in court filings [9][14]. - The plaintiffs' legal representatives expressed disagreement with the court's conclusion, highlighting the unprecedented nature of Meta's alleged copyright violations [14].