WHKG(SH:600168) Zheng Quan Zhi Xing·2025-06-30 16:34Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter from Hubei Ruitong Tianyuan Law Firm confirms the legality of the convening and conducting of the second extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Wuhan San Zhen Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd. in 2025, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2][3] Summary by Sections 1. Convening Procedure of the Shareholders' Meeting - The ninth board of directors of the company made a resolution to convene the shareholders' meeting, with the notice published on June 14, 2025, in various financial newspapers and on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's official website [2][3] 2. Holding of the Shareholders' Meeting - The shareholders' meeting was held on June 30, 2025, using a combination of on-site and online voting methods, with the actual time, location, and agenda consistent with the notice [3][4] 3. Qualifications of the Meeting Convenor and Attendees - The convenor of the meeting was the company's board of directors, which had the legal authority to convene the meeting. A total of 189 shareholders participated, representing 600,492,519 shares, accounting for 60.4483% of the total shares [4][5] 4. Online Voting Process - Shareholders could vote online through the Shanghai Stock Exchange's voting system, with specific time slots for voting. A total of 188 shareholders participated in online voting, representing 201,351,755 shares, or 20.2689% of the total shares [5][6] 5. Voting Procedures - The voting process combined both on-site and online votes, with results verified by shareholder representatives and the law firm. No temporary motions were introduced during the meeting [6][7] 6. Voting Results - The voting results for key resolutions included: - Proposal to cancel the supervisory board and amend the articles of association: 99.7957% in favor [6][7] - Proposal to establish rules for shareholder meetings: 99.8183% in favor [7] - Proposal to amend rules for board meetings: 99.8183% in favor [7] 7. Conclusion - The law firm concluded that the meeting's convening, participant qualifications, and voting results were all in compliance with the relevant laws and regulations, affirming the legality and validity of the proceedings [8]