美国翻脸了！特朗普刚表示对中美框架协议已经签字

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent proposal by U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham to impose a 500% tariff on countries purchasing Russian oil, particularly targeting China and India, highlighting the contradictory nature of U.S. foreign policy and its implications for international relations [3][7][15]. Group 1: U.S. Tariff Proposal - The proposed legislation aims to pressure China and India to cease purchasing Russian oil by imposing exorbitant tariffs, reflecting a strategy to force these countries to align with U.S. interests [3][7]. - The U.S. has been criticized for its dual approach of supporting Ukraine while simultaneously engaging in trade practices that involve Russian oil, raising questions about its credibility [3][10]. Group 2: China's Oil Imports - In 2023, China imported over 120 million tons of oil from Russia, accounting for more than 20% of its total oil imports, indicating the strategic importance of this relationship for China's supply chain [7][10]. - China has diversified its oil imports, becoming the world's largest crude oil importer in 2023, with total imports exceeding 500 million tons from various regions, making it difficult for the U.S. to disrupt this cooperation through tariffs [10][11]. Group 3: Historical Context and Implications - The article references past instances of U.S. trade policy reversals, such as the 2018 trade war and the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan, suggesting a pattern of inconsistent U.S. foreign policy that undermines international trust [9][15]. - The potential approval of the 500% tariff could signify a significant shift in U.S.-China relations, moving beyond trade disagreements to a more confrontational stance [15][16].