批判原生家庭，为何成了一种“时髦”？

Group 1 - The concept of "family of origin" has gained popularity in China since the mid-2010s, becoming a common topic in discussions about family relationships and personal growth [1][2] - "Family of origin" refers to the family environment in which an individual is born and raised, contrasting with "family of formation" or "family of procreation" [2][3] - The term has evolved from a neutral concept in English to a more negative connotation in Chinese, reflecting societal discussions about family trauma and dysfunction [5][10] Group 2 - The "Darkness Model of Family Communication" highlights problematic interactions within families, using metaphors of varying shades to represent the severity of family issues [6][7] - Discussions on platforms like Bilibili reveal a range of family traumas, emphasizing the impact of individual behaviors, relational dynamics, and societal factors on family systems [9][10] - The rise of the "family of origin" discourse serves as a critical lens for examining power dynamics within families, challenging traditional views on filial piety and unconditional parental love [10][11] Group 3 - The phenomenon of "psychologization of the family" combines critiques of family dynamics with psychological therapy culture, providing a framework for individuals to understand their personal struggles [12][13] - Participants in discussions often focus on the long-term negative effects of poor family environments on personality development and mental health, advocating for self-healing and personal growth [14][18] - The emergence of this discourse reflects a shift towards individualistic understandings of family relationships, moving away from traditional moral frameworks [19][22] Group 4 - The popularity of the "family of origin" discourse is linked to the broader trend of increasing interest in mental health and psychological well-being in society [18][19] - This discourse provides a new framework for understanding family relationships, emphasizing individual psychological health and self-actualization as key goals [19][20] - While the discourse has limitations, such as oversimplifying complex personal issues, it represents a significant step towards self-awareness and societal understanding in a culture that has historically suppressed individual expression [20][22]