两则新闻看调研（人民论坛）

Group 1 - The article highlights two contrasting examples of research and investigation practices, one positive and one negative, emphasizing the importance of genuine engagement with the community [1] - The positive example from Hangzhou demonstrates effective grassroots engagement by local officials who experienced the life of delivery riders for 60 days, leading to targeted service improvements [1][2] - The negative example from Henan illustrates bureaucratic inefficiency, where a local official spent significant funds on superficial improvements to meet assessment criteria, which was publicly criticized [1] Group 2 - The article stresses that effective research should focus on understanding real issues and finding solutions, rather than adhering to bureaucratic formalities [2] - Successful research outcomes are measured by the resolution of identified problems, with a call for officials to engage directly with the community to gather genuine feedback [2][3] - The implementation of a feedback loop in Zhejiang's "民情日记" system has proven effective in maintaining ongoing communication between the community and officials, resulting in a more responsive governance model [2]