一味追求遥遥领先，多半是病了

Group 1 - The core argument emphasizes that a country's technological innovation capability is determined more by its ability to capture and apply technological results rather than by original inventions [1][2] - The article uses Huawei as an example, highlighting its success in telecommunications, smartphones, and electric vehicles through imitation and learning from companies like Cisco, Samsung, and Tesla, rather than through original inventions [1][2] - The historical context shows that countries like Germany, the US, and Japan achieved technological advancements through rapid and continuous technology diffusion, with original inventions being secondary outcomes [2] Group 2 - The Wright brothers invented the airplane, but the aviation industry developed in Europe, illustrating that invention alone does not guarantee industrial success [3][4][5] - Despite the Wright brothers' invention, the US aviation industry lagged behind Europe for years due to a lack of commercial orders and industrial infrastructure [5][8] - The article argues that without the ability to convert inventions into products, technological innovations remain ineffective and do not impact society [9] Group 3 - The article discusses the importance of technology diffusion over original invention, citing Henry Kaiser’s innovations in shipbuilding as an example of applying techniques from other industries to achieve success [10][14] - Japan's shipbuilding industry rose from the ashes by combining innovative techniques with government support and market opportunities, surpassing the US and UK [15] - The US shipbuilding industry, despite having advanced technology, stagnated due to protective measures that limited the application of efficient manufacturing processes [11][12] Group 4 - Innovation is framed as an economic concept rather than a purely technical one, focusing on the introduction of new combinations of production factors into the economy [18][20] - The article emphasizes that the true measure of technological innovation lies in its economic value and the ability to create products that can be marketed [27][31] - The low patent conversion rate in Chinese universities compared to enterprises highlights the gap in translating research into economic benefits [25][32] Group 5 - The article asserts that the trend of enterprise-led innovation is a global phenomenon, with businesses increasingly taking the lead in research and development funding [34][39] - The US leads in corporate R&D spending, with a significant portion coming from the private sector, indicating a shift away from government-led initiatives [39][41] - Large enterprises are identified as the main drivers of technological diffusion, possessing superior capabilities in market information collection, product promotion, and resource integration [42][45] Group 6 - The article concludes that the competition between the US and China in technological innovation is evident, but there remains a disparity in the overall strength of large enterprises [47][48] - It advocates for a pragmatic approach that emphasizes economic benefits from technological innovation, focusing on market applications rather than merely pursuing original inventions [48][49]