北京首例利用AI制图侵犯著作权案，四人被判刑

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of using AI technology to modify and sell copyrighted works, emphasizing that even minor alterations do not exempt individuals from copyright infringement [1][5]. Group 1: Case Overview - Four defendants, including Luo and Yao, used AI tools to make slight modifications to original artworks, resulting in the sale of over 3,000 infringing puzzle products and generating illegal profits exceeding 270,000 RMB [2][3]. - The defendants believed that minor changes would allow them to circumvent copyright laws, but their actions were deemed as substantial infringement [2][5]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The court proceedings revealed that the defendants admitted guilt and returned illegal profits, with Luo compensating the original artist 150,000 RMB [3][4]. - The court sentenced the e-commerce company and the individuals involved to various penalties, including prison time and fines, with the company fined 100,000 RMB and Luo and Yao each receiving 18 months in prison [4]. Group 3: Legal Interpretation - The judge clarified that the lack of intellectual labor in generating the images through AI tools constituted copyright infringement, as the images were deemed substantially similar to the original works [5]. - The ruling established clear legal boundaries for the application of AI technology in creative fields, reinforcing the importance of intellectual property protection [5]. Group 4: Implications for AI Technology - The case serves as a reminder that while AI can facilitate creativity, it also poses significant legal risks if used improperly, particularly in relation to copyright infringement [6][7]. - There is a need for increased awareness and understanding of intellectual property laws among creators using AI tools to ensure compliance and protect their works [6][7].