苏超最让人担心的一幕还是发生了……

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rising popularity of the Jiangsu Super League (Jiangsu City Football League) and the contrasting perceptions of its quality compared to the national team, highlighting the media's role in shaping public opinion and the potential future of the league [1][5][10]. Group 1: Media and Public Perception - The media, including Xinhua News Agency, has been criticized for mocking national team player Wu Xi by comparing him unfavorably to a player from the Jiangsu Super League, which has sparked outrage among fans [1][4]. - Wu Xi is recognized for his dedication and contributions to the national team, with fans defending his professional spirit despite the media's ridicule [2][4]. - The phenomenon of mocking the national team while praising the Jiangsu Super League reflects a broader trend of fans and media engaging in a rivalry that undermines the spirit of football [10][11]. Group 2: Jiangsu Super League's Structure and Operations - The Jiangsu Super League operates with a unique financial model, providing players with daily training subsidies instead of salaries, and offering bonuses based on team performance [6][7]. - The league's player composition primarily consists of youth players from professional teams, indicating a reliance on lower-tier talent rather than established professionals [5][6]. - Despite the league's popularity, there is a lack of transparency regarding its financial operations, including revenue distribution and long-term planning, which raises questions about its sustainability [7][9]. Group 3: Future Prospects and Challenges - The article suggests that the Jiangsu Super League could evolve into a more commercially viable league if it attracts higher-level players and incorporates market mechanisms [10][11]. - The current government-led model may limit the league's potential unless it transitions to a more professional structure that can sustain viewer interest and competitive quality [11]. - The future of the Jiangsu Super League hinges on its ability to balance community engagement with professional standards, ensuring it does not become stagnant or lose its appeal [10][11].