《酱园弄》砸掉了《好东西》们的市场

Core Viewpoint - The film "酱园弄" has sparked controversy due to its failure to deliver expected box office success and critical acclaim, despite its all-star cast and intriguing historical premise. The film's narrative and thematic issues have led to negative public perception, particularly regarding its portrayal of women's suffering without addressing the underlying social issues [1][2][3]. Group 1: Film's Narrative and Historical Representation - The film has been criticized for deliberately altering historical details and incorporating sensational elements, which detracts from genuine social progress and instead serves commercial interests [2][4]. - The narrative employs a "city feminism" approach, using women's stories as a facade for urban promotion, which lacks authenticity and connection to real social issues [4][5]. - The portrayal of historical context and class dynamics is distorted, presenting a simplified and misleading view of the societal conditions during the time period depicted [5][9][11]. Group 2: Class and Gender Dynamics - The film's representation of class is overly simplistic, failing to capture the complexities of social hierarchies and instead reinforcing stereotypes of the lower class as perpetually oppressed [9][10][11]. - The narrative suggests a false dichotomy where elite characters are depicted as saviors of the oppressed, which misrepresents the actual historical roles of these figures [11][12][14]. - The film's focus on sensational violence and victimization of women obscures the broader social struggles and realities faced by women in that era [19][20][30]. Group 3: Commercialization of Women's Stories - The film exemplifies a trend where women's narratives are commodified for urban branding and profit, stripping them of their historical context and significance [28][30]. - This commercialization leads to a superficial understanding of women's issues, reducing them to mere marketing tools rather than genuine representations of their struggles [28][30]. - The film's marketing strategies, including associations with feminist movements, are criticized for being misleading and disconnected from the actual historical context [24][28].