AI杀死了破折号，也绞杀了语文

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of distinguishing AI-generated content from human writing through the use of specific punctuation marks, particularly the em dash and quotation marks, which have become symbols of AI writing [1][21][38]. Group 1: AI and Punctuation - The em dash and quotation marks are identified as common features in AI-generated text, leading to a societal response of avoiding these symbols to differentiate human writing from AI [21][52][60]. - The use of these punctuation marks is seen as a reflection of cultural and logical expression, which is now being abandoned to combat AI content [38][67]. - The article highlights a paradox where, to prove human authorship, individuals may need to relinquish previously valued linguistic tools [24][38][67]. Group 2: Cultural Implications - The reliance on specific punctuation as a means of identification reflects a broader cultural shift towards simpler, more primitive forms of communication in response to AI [67][72]. - This shift may lead to a degradation of language richness and expression, as society moves towards a more colloquial and less nuanced mode of communication [70][72]. - The article suggests that the future of human expression may resemble informal, error-prone language, devoid of the complexity that characterized previous writing styles [75][78].