为何说“大而美”法案是本世纪最危险的债务陷阱？

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the Trump 2.0 era represents a significant shift in U.S. domestic and foreign policy, characterized by aggressive economic measures and a departure from multilateralism [1][2][3] - Trump 2.0 is marked by a series of controversial actions, including large-scale deportations, threats to international territories, and the imposition of a "Trump tax" on over 60 countries, which has severely impacted the post-World War II global trade system [2][3] - The article suggests that Trump's approach is not merely chaotic but reflects a strategic intent to reshape the global order to prioritize U.S. interests, potentially leading to a fragmented international landscape [1][5][6] Group 2 - The article discusses the potential for a "tax-debt" style of imperialism under Trump, where the U.S. seeks to impose high tariffs and sell interest-free bonds to other nations, aiming to alleviate its own economic burdens while extracting resources from global partners [6][7] - It highlights the changing dynamics of global power, with Russia regaining status as a significant player while Europe is losing its influence, as evidenced by the ongoing Ukraine conflict and the shifting geopolitical landscape [7][9] - China's position is portrayed as steadily rising, with its diplomatic stance during the Ukraine conflict earning it respect and recognition as a responsible global power, contrasting with the U.S. approach [9][10] Group 3 - The article posits that the world is moving towards a multipolar era, where the traditional U.S.-centric global order is disintegrating, leading to increased competition and potential conflicts among major powers [10][11] - It emphasizes the need for a new global order characterized by "competitive coexistence," where major powers engage in rivalry while avoiding total conflict, suggesting a complex interplay of competition and cooperation [13][14] - The future of the Trump 2.0 era remains uncertain, with questions about its lasting impact on global politics and economics, indicating a need for ongoing observation and analysis [14][15]