中欧贸易战开打？欧盟要限制中国！中国被迫反制！欧盟为何反水？

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the escalating tensions between China and the EU, particularly regarding trade disputes and protective measures [1][2][5] - China initiated an anti-dumping investigation against EU-origin brandy, citing a dumping margin of 27.7%-34.9%, and imposed a five-year anti-dumping duty starting July 5 [1][6] - The EU's decision to impose additional tariffs of up to 38.1% on Chinese electric vehicles is seen as a significant point of contention, reflecting a broader trend of trade protectionism from the EU [1][4][15] Group 2 - The French Finance Minister's comments indicate a growing sentiment among some European politicians that trade with China could harm European interests, which may hinder healthy bilateral relations [2][4] - The EU's unilateral imposition of anti-dumping duties is viewed as a double standard, undermining fair competition principles and reflecting anxiety over China's industrial advancements [5][6] - China's response to the EU's trade measures, including the anti-dumping investigation and restrictions on medical devices, demonstrates its commitment to defending its trade rights while advocating for fair and open trade practices [6][15] Group 3 - The complex dynamics of China-EU relations provide both challenges and opportunities for diplomatic engagement, as highlighted by recent high-level dialogues between Chinese officials and EU leaders [10][12] - Misinterpretations and misinformation in media regarding China-EU negotiations can disrupt the communication process and hinder mutual understanding [10][12] - The articles suggest that cooperation between China and the EU is essential for maintaining global economic stability and countering unilateralism, particularly in the context of U.S. trade policies [15]