杭州银行上海分行领380万元罚单 多业务违规暴露风险

Company Dynamics - On July 4, the Shanghai Regulatory Bureau of the National Financial Supervision Administration disclosed that Hangzhou Bank's Shanghai branch was fined 3.8 million yuan due to multiple violations, with several responsible individuals also receiving warnings and fines [2][3] - Hangzhou Bank, established in September 1996 and headquartered in Hangzhou, went public on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on October 27, 2016. The bank has over 200 branches, primarily operating in Hangzhou and other cities in Zhejiang Province, with a presence in developed economic zones such as the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta [2] - This fine marks the first regulatory penalty for Hangzhou Bank in 2025, indicating a complex web of violations across various business areas, revealing significant gaps in risk management and internal controls [2][3] - In the credit business, issues with the "three checks" (pre-loan investigation, in-loan review, and post-loan inspection) were particularly prominent, with serious violations of prudent operational rules noted in the pre-loan investigation of working capital loans and the supervision of loan usage [2][3] Regulatory Actions - The penalties not only affected Hangzhou Bank's Shanghai branch but also led to warnings and fines for several individuals, including assistant managers and branch heads, for serious violations in personal loan management, property loan management, and other areas [4] - Specific individuals received warnings and fines of 50,000 yuan each for their roles in various violations, emphasizing the regulatory focus on enhancing compliance awareness among senior management [4] Financial Performance - As of the first quarter of 2025, Hangzhou Bank reported total assets of 2.22 trillion yuan, total loans of 995.196 billion yuan, total liabilities of 2.08 trillion yuan, and total deposits of 1.35 trillion yuan. The bank achieved revenue of 9.978 billion yuan and a net profit attributable to shareholders of 6.021 billion yuan during the reporting period. The non-performing loan ratio stood at 0.76%, with a provision coverage ratio of 530.07% [4]