牧师、政客与性服务者：AI取代不了的人

Group 1 - The core idea of the article revolves around the concept of "AI resistance," suggesting that certain professions are more likely to survive the AI revolution due to their inherent human qualities and social significance rather than efficiency [2][5][7] - The three professions identified as having "AI resistance" are priests, politicians, and sex workers, which are characterized by their reliance on deep social recognition and interpersonal relationships rather than technical skills [5][29][33] - The article emphasizes that the fear of AI is not merely about job loss but rather about the existential threat it poses to human identity and social connections [14][17][68] Group 2 - The article discusses how AI's inability to engage in social and ethical accountability limits its acceptance in roles traditionally held by humans, such as those of politicians and priests [18][38][49] - It highlights the importance of emotional connection and human experience in professions, suggesting that AI lacks the capacity to provide genuine emotional engagement, which is crucial for trust and social bonds [58][60][68] - The discussion extends to the evolving nature of belief systems and social roles in the context of AI, indicating that while traditional religions may decline, new forms of belief and community will emerge, emphasizing the need for human connection [30][32][68]