美对除中国外170国加关税！印度：中国行我也行，带头反击霸权

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing trade tensions between the United States and various countries, particularly focusing on the contrasting responses of China and India to U.S. tariff threats, highlighting China's strong industrial capabilities compared to India's weaknesses in this context [1][4][10]. Group 1: China's Response - China is positioned strongly in the trade conflict, willing to negotiate while also prepared to retaliate, leveraging its significant resources such as rare earth elements, which are crucial for U.S. military and technology sectors [1][4]. - The U.S. heavily relies on China for rare earth imports, with 90% of its supply coming from China, indicating that any restrictions on these exports could severely impact U.S. industries [1]. - China's strategy includes developing domestic alternatives to U.S. technology, such as chip replacements and aircraft engines, which has led to U.S. companies urging the government to ease trade tensions [1][4]. Group 2: India's Response - India attempts to mimic China's approach but lacks the necessary leverage, as its threats to retaliate against U.S. tariffs are not taken seriously due to its limited market and technological capabilities [3][4]. - The Indian government faces internal challenges, particularly in agriculture, where reforms have led to significant pushback from farmers, complicating its ability to negotiate with the U.S. [3][4]. - India's foreign exchange reserves are significantly lower than China's, with only about $600 billion compared to China's over $3 trillion, limiting India's capacity to sustain a prolonged trade conflict [4]. Group 3: Comparative Analysis - The article emphasizes the disparity in manufacturing capabilities, with China's manufacturing value added to GDP consistently above 27%, while India's remains below 15%, illustrating the challenges India faces in becoming a global manufacturing hub [10]. - The contrasting strategies of China and India are highlighted, with China engaging directly and effectively in the trade war, while India appears reactive and less capable of mounting a serious challenge [8][10].