国足和苏超，一根线上的蚂蚱

Group 1 - The Chinese national football team suffered a 0-3 defeat against South Korea in the East Asian Cup, highlighting the team's weaknesses despite the South Korean team not being at full strength [1] - The performance of the national team has led to increased criticism and mockery from fans, particularly in light of the popularity of the Suzhou Super League (Su Super) [2][3] - The relationship between the Su Super and the national team is complex, as both are part of the same football ecosystem in China, with the national team's performance reflecting the overall quality of Chinese football [4][5] Group 2 - The poor performance of the national team can be attributed to several factors, including inadequate league organization and insufficient youth training systems [6][8] - Both Su Super and the Chinese Super League (CSL) draw players from similar youth training backgrounds, indicating a shared foundation in player development [7] - The CSL is often criticized as a "pseudo-professional league," lacking true market-driven characteristics, while the Su Super is government-led, suggesting similarities in their operational structures [8][9] Group 3 - The CSL has a deeper marketization and internationalization compared to the Su Super, but both leagues share management styles that prioritize government influence over shareholder interests [9][10] - The Su Super's success in attracting crowds and generating economic activity is not unique, as the CSL also contributes to local economies through fan engagement and tourism [10] - The notion that the Su Super is merely a tool for entertainment overlooks the intrinsic value of football as a cultural and economic driver [11]