Workflow
晨丰科技: 北京金诚同达(沈阳)律师事务所关于晨丰科技2025年第三次临时股东会的法律意见书

Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the third extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Zhejiang Chenfeng Technology Co., Ltd. in 2025 comply with relevant laws and regulations, as well as the company's articles of association [2][9]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The third extraordinary general meeting was convened by the company's board of directors and announced on June 23, 2025, through the Shanghai Stock Exchange and designated media [2][3]. - The meeting utilized a combination of on-site and online voting, allowing shareholders to exercise their voting rights through the Shanghai Stock Exchange's online voting system [3][5]. - The on-site meeting took place on July 9, 2025, at the company's conference room in Haining, Zhejiang Province [3]. Group 2: Attendance and Qualifications - Eligible attendees included all shareholders registered with the China Securities Depository and Clearing Corporation Limited as of the close of trading on July 2, 2025, with a total of 115 participants representing 34,383,960 shares, accounting for 27.9227% of the total voting shares [5][6]. - The meeting was attended by one shareholder in person and 114 shareholders via online voting, with no instances of duplicate voting reported [6][7]. Group 3: Proposals and Voting Results - The meeting reviewed two proposals: the election of a non-independent director and the increase of the estimated guarantee amount for 2025 [7]. - The voting results showed that 99.6870% of the votes supported the election of the non-independent director, while 99.4706% supported the increase in the guarantee amount [7][8]. - The voting results for minority investors indicated that 81.5627% supported the election of the non-independent director, and 68.8138% supported the increase in the guarantee amount [7]. Group 4: Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's procedures, attendance qualifications, and voting processes were in compliance with the Company Law, Shareholders' Meeting Rules, and the company's articles of association, rendering the voting results valid [9].