让“逃逸式辞职”无处遁形（纵横）

Group 1 - The core issue of "escape-style resignation" in state-owned enterprises is highlighted, indicating a significant concern regarding corruption and the need for targeted governance [1][2] - The phenomenon of "escape-style resignation" is categorized into three types: "avoidance type," "option type," and "profit type," each representing different methods of evading accountability [1] - The revised regulations under the "Disciplinary Measures for the Communist Party of China" emphasize that resignation does not exempt individuals from legal consequences, reinforcing the importance of comprehensive oversight [2] Group 2 - The persistent issue of "escape-style resignation" in state-owned enterprises reflects the ongoing complexity of anti-corruption efforts, necessitating a robust regulatory framework [2] - Recommendations for improving oversight include strict pre-resignation management, detailed regulations on post-resignation employment, and rigorous post-resignation monitoring [2] - The message conveyed is that leaving a position does not equate to escaping accountability, and enhanced governance measures are essential to ensure compliance and integrity among officials [2]